By the Dashboard Lights

            by Dave Friedli

 

10/30/03

 

In the Bag

 

            Remember how mom used to say, "Ummmm!  Taste this.  This is SOOOO

good!  It tastes just like..."?

            It never tasted "just like".

            In fact, when dear old mom added the phrase "tastes just like", you

KNEW something was amiss.

            To mom's credit, she seldom used the "tastes just like" simile in

defense of her cooking.

            Mom's cooking was almost always superb.

            Even if it wasn't, as kids we were always so hungry from

working/playing/studying/sleeping half the day that we ravenously ate

whatever was placed before us.

            In The Wife's defense, sometimes choices are made in life solely on

cost alone.

            Which explains how the non-Starbucks bag of coffee found its' way

into the house this weekend.

            "The Starbucks was over $8.00 for a 12-ounce bag at Hy-Vee, and this

Eight-O-Clock coffee was only $3.95.  And people say Eight-O-Clock

coffee tastes just like...."

            I lost consciousness at that point.

            Sure, Starbucks coffee is pricey.  But its' flavor is unique.

            A friend says it is regular old coffee which is simply over-roasted

to add a slightly-burnt flavor in the cup.

            Whatever.

            Put me in a taste test and all other things being equal, I can

probably pick out the Starbucks.

            In the 1970's, the Pepsi taste test set out to win people over from

drinking Coca-Cola with the amazing results that people couldn't tell

the difference between the world's largest seller and the choice of a

new generation.

            The oldest daughter's science fair experiment one year proved people

couldn't taste the difference between tap water, bottled water and

water from a water pitcher with a built-in charcoal filter.

            Regardless of that scientific proof, I will maintain there is a

gigantic difference in coffee brands.

            And among the brands, there is also a discernible difference in the

types of roasting processes and, apparently, in the country of origin.

            Eight-O-Clock coffee doesn't contain bad beans.  When the package is

opened, they don't swear or attempt to escape or refuse to exit the

bag on command.

            These coffee beans are docile creatures.  As beans go, they are

middle of the road, sit on the fence beans.  Brewing them is quite

fine for company and social occasions.

            But I am out for the caffeine jolt when I brew my cup of joe.  I

want kick.  I want flavor.  I want coffee that tastes the same

straight out of the pot as it does four hours later, cold in the cup.

            That is what Starbucks provides. 

            The secret, I think, is not in how the coffee is roasted or in how

it is brewed. The real difference is where this bean has its literal

roots. Starbucks, at least the last case or two which has made its

way from bag to grinder to Mr. Coffee, comes from Columbia.

            It is strong, bold and can more or less stand up by itself, even if

a cup is not available.

            When you drink Starbucks, you know you've had a cup of coffee, now

as well as three hours later when the caffeine is still having a

stimulant effect on the neurotransmitters of the brain.

            The current bag of Eight-O-Clock coffee boasts that it is "French

Roast".

            That explains most everything that isn't right about a coffee named

after a time of day.  Viva la Columbian!